Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
We all know, which party is always waving the flag, always wanting to go back to the Constitution when it agrees with them, dismisses the Supreme Court, when a ruling goes against them. Right? Sure!
Mandating a religion. No, you just want to get of one, the Muslims. All of them are a direct threat to our national security. Mass punishment is a lazy man's way of correcting a problem. "Discourage or ban Muslims." Why stop there? Getting rid of a religion almost worked before in one country, and we are exceptional so we should be able to get the job done the right way. Like the religious leader said in Gunga Din, "Kill or be killed? Kill! Kill! Kill!" This comment goes right back to the person that made the original post that I addressed, and not you.
There are only around 3 million Muslims in the US. No big deal. If we can deport 11 million illegals, we won't even break up a sweat in killing 3 million Muslims. Sieg heil!
Voter id law is a myth. I will ask for the seventh time, Please explain the comment made by the Penn. Speaker of the House, when their voter ID law was passed, "We just gave Penn. to Romney."
The reason Americans don't want to do the work on farms isn't the pay, and it's the hard work, and long hours.
Concerning the illegal immigrants, why wasn't the bipartisan Senate bill voted upon in the House several years ago? If it had, Obama wouldn't have issued his executive order on immigration. If the Republicans were worried about giving the illegals a path to citizenship, because they wouldn't vote for them, then don't give them a path to citizenship. Trump has got to be kidding with his statement deport 11 million illegals, and then bring back the good ones. Again, a simple solution to a complex problem, which is a lazy man's special.
I read somewhere today, and I am not going to look for the article, that 40% on the Muslims in the US were US citizens that converted to the religion. We will be inflicting punishment on our own. How is that acceptable. Again, wasn't that tried WW2 with the Japanese, and we have admitted our mistake? Right!
|
Typical liberal agenda. One extreme or another, never a between or compromise. The party of "it can't be done."
Who was it again that said it was either his deal or go to war? No in between allowed I guess. Funny how sanctions worked for a long time, but they can't work now. It has to be Obama's deal or a war.
Same thing as you are saying. It has to be all or nothing. You all are perfectly OK with changing the constitution or interpreting it YOUR way, but shame on anyone else making a suggestion.
Sorry, but in my country we don't work hard to protect liberals for nothing. We also want a bit of national security. I'd love to hear you slant on the gun laws. No, actually I wouldn't.
I never said one word about killing Muslims in America. I didn't even say anything about deporting them. You seem to read what ever you want. It's bad enough that Muslims are allowed to get their photos taken for driver's licenses with their burka covering their faces. Either we start NOW to defend our country or we surrender to the radicals and give up our freedom.
Liberals don't mind if someone else sacrifices for their freedom. They think they are fighting the war for freedom when they march on Wall St. Or protest when some stupid thug criminal is gunned down by a police officer. That's how they defend our country.
Getting off the soap box now. Isn't it a nice day?