Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Fine. Now answer the question, what should Obama do to stop ISIS?
Comparing not wanting to pay taxes to not wanting to send ground troops to stop ISIS is totally unbelievable. If we don't pay taxes, the country doesn't function. If we don't stop ISIS, the country is just fine. ISIS is going to invade the US with large number of ground troops? That is what you are implying.
Russia with its alliance with Assad, and Iran with its Muslim leaning (Shia, or Suni, I can't tell one from the other) with Iran will take a more active role in getting rid of ISIS. The enemy of our enemy( double negative) is our friend. ISIS is a more direct threat to them, because they are in the immediate area. If you want to call it leading from behind, go right ahead.
Iraq should be split into three countries. ISIS controlling one of them is an option. At some point on the near future, Assad has got to go.
|
Talk about being criminally naïve ... sheez ... I've seen a lot of incredibly narrow and stupid comments on this board but you take the cake. With your comments about ISIS, you clearly don't have a geopolitical bone in your body.
To answer your question ... Obama is functionally incapable of stopping ISIS because he is not a leader. He is also weak, feminine and irresolute except when he fights the "safe" enemy of Republicans.
A true leader would explain to the country the stakes with ISIS, connect the dots with the Islamic refugee invasion and destruction of Christianity in the Middle East ... and then wage total war. New rules of engagement ... the cities under ISIS control are carpet bombed until everything and everyone living there is dead. Get an Arab coalition army BUT use US troops and let them loose.
Problem solved.