Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
And when might you have protested gangster rap? I have listened to Ann Coulter's hate speech for years. Now I have an opportunity to use my freedom of speech and protest. Thank you for your service and my 3 nephews, current serving, for protecting it.
The last time I protested anything was the current wars in the middle east...
Come on down and counter protest then we can all head to the square for a cold one!
This is the current comment I took offense to
Ann Coulter unleashes her nativist fury on Pope Francis and Catholics: |
Sorry, but I'm not familiar with this publication, but based on the way the article was written, I have to conclude that the writer is not a fan of Ms. Coulter.
After reading it, I have to ask, did the founders consider not allowing Catholics to become citizens? Was their concern that Catholics had an anti capitalist, socialistic bent? If those things are true, then what is wrong with her statement?
I am a conservative, but not a fan of Ann Coulter. I think that we can have reasonable discussion without all the name calling and antagonism. But it does seem that the gist of what she says in many cases is skewed by the way in which she says it.
In fact I don't agree with Bernie Sanders on much of anything except when he said this:
Quote:
“Too often in our country, and I think both sides bear responsibility for us, there is to much shouting, at each other, there is too much making fun of each other.”
“It is easy to go out and talk with people who agree with you.”
“It is harder but not less important for us to try and communicate with those that do not agree with us.”
|
So can we stop shouting and making fun of each other?
Please stop the name calling and insults. We are all Americans and simply have disagreements on how our country should be run.
In the end, no one philosophy is going to rule. Everything will be a compromise. That is what Reagan and Clinton both understood.