Originally Posted by Guest

Is this what passes for being open minded, and look at both sides of an argument before coming to a conclusion? So, pointing to a few is the justification for condemning the many. Simple solution to a complex problem is the product of a simple mind.

If voter fraud is so wide spread, why aren't more people being charged? If they know that they are registered in two different places, and voted in both place, isn't that an open and shut case?

I heard one Fox interview of a South Carolina government official, The official stated that there were 20,000+ people registered in two places within the state. The Fox interviewed stated, "how can anyone see that the new voter id law isn't necessary?" Wasn't a better question, "how many of these people voted twice?" They know they were registered in two places, and they know, if they voted twice.

So, they know that the registering twice in the same state doesn't pass the swell test. So, what they do, they say that there is voter fraud of people voting in two different states. The implication is that only Democrats vote twice.