Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Aren't we splitting hairs? Of course, the comment didn't hit courts. There was nothing slanderous about it. The Penn. House leader's comment was about the Penn new voter ID laws. The court threw out the new Penn. voter id law. The court knew, who the voter id law, was directed at. The judge didn't need the comment of the house leader to come to his ruling. Post 20, implied that the house leader comment was a one day event, and should have gone away in one day. I didn't imply anything.
So, what the hell did I make up? This isn't directed at you, but take a look at the post right after yours. See what I have to put up with. For some reason known only to him, he must think that name calling bothers me.
|
Perhaps if you stuck with facts instead of saying that the comment ended up in court which was nothing but a manufactured lie that you told.
People do not normally take kindly to lying.
I know what the court case was about....I know when the aside was said....I know what he meant. YOU combined all of it to make something up which appears to be your way of posting.
Your call...do what you want, but that is why you get grief.
You do not call it a lie....it is, you know..you said something that was not true.....that is called a LIE !