Quote:
Originally Posted by outlaw
That's why I said rifles. And snopes is biased as h3!!. Even they have their agenda. Snopes is masterful at comparing apples and oranges, cherry picking data, etc. The same technique you used by posting a lot of "data" regarding gun violence versus other weapons, as if it refuted my assertion, which it did not.
|
Snopes does have the bias of the couple who run it. They just research some urban myth or some other tidbit and post what they find.
Their Tinfoil Hat conspiracy nut board is where they put some e-mails they get which seem unbelievable to them. The peanut gallery they have on there then cut into the e-mail senders with whatever they think will get a big laugh out of the rest of the group. The original e-mail senders though are banned from getting onto this group to defend themselves. That's my problem with Snopes.com. I got dropped into their shark tank and ripped to pieces for years with no ability to fight back. As for who funds them-- I believe that they are funded by advertisers?