Originally Posted by Guest

I suppose it depends on perspective, and I am sure you give no credence to this but...

"Republicans, meanwhile, pointed the blame squarely at the Obama administration. If Clinton and other current and former officials had merely responded to their requests in a timely manner, they say, the investigation would have ended long ago.

House Democrats “are right back where they have always been—complaining about process and procedure rather than lifting a finger to help complete the task,” committee spokesman Jamal Ware said in an emailed statement.

“Maybe if committee Democrats had sent one request to the executive branch, or signed onto a letter, instead of running a rearguard action for the Clinton campaign, perhaps the administration would have hastened its cooperation,” he added.

“Instead, the Democrats do what they always do, issue a press release citing some arbitrary milestone and claiming some Democrat strawman has not been proven.”"

Benghazi panel now longer than Watergate probe | TheHill

Neither party has comported themselves well, but I am sure based on your juvenile choice of words, and general lack of knowledge beyond talking points of the issues involved, you will disagree.

The mantle and way of our New Democratic Party to to attack by name and party, and let me be clear I am not speaking of forums like this, but of the leaders of that party right to the Oval Office.

While I, and many others see the errors on both sides, you will not be swayed which really makes me feel sad for you.....ignorance is NOT bliss.