Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mikark
Am I wrong but doesn't your article state the date as 2006? Is this an update from the original article?
|
That's a good question. I'm going to assume that it is not updated, that it is the original Feb 06 article with nothing added. I will attempt to find any follow-up on this issue, but in the interim, I believe it can safe to again assume that I screwed it up and go really old news and thought it fresh. Mea culpa, :bow: mea culpa, :bow: mea maxima culpa. :bow: :bow: :bow: And yes, I know what "assume" implies.