Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Was Hillary Clinton A Woman Scorned?
View Single Post
 
Old 10-25-2015, 08:22 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
First, speaking of the candidates as you did, a FULL year ahead before any primaries serves no purpose. Of course, you know the list of leaders in polls at this time is filled with mostly non Presidents so will not respond to that part. I also find it offensive and rude calling people idiots. Does not do anything but make you look bad frankly but that is your call. Mostly when I speak negative, as I do and will, on Clinton for example or even our President, I offer a backup for what I am saying and have never referred to anyone as you did WITHOUT backing it up.

You are misunderstanding the idea here. I am taking no side on the continuing debate on Fox news. That debate was begun by Media Matters and the Democrat party in concert with their media outlets. I am neither a watcher of Fox news on a steady basis, nor any of the cable news channels.

I am being a bit self centered here, but want to insure you understand where I am coming from. I watch Morning Joe every morning of my life actually and have since the day it began. I also will watch CNN and MSNBC depending on what I am looking for.

Not sure I understand your question on other stations, but the implication is that Fox is favored to watch because they lean right and that Republicans have no other place to go. Now that gets to the crux of my point.

I subscribe to theory that you learn by investigating. Investigate by reading. If you want to add some tv watching to your background, so be it. Most of the basis for my information and posts are from reading.

The very nature of my comments revolve about people who actually use Media Matters or other sources (THINK PROGRESS for one). Those sites do not lean left; THEY ARE ACTUAL WORKING PARTS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY and using them as a source of information is totally dumb because you will only read revisionist history or revisionist facts. YOU WILL NOT LEARN ANYTHING. YOU WILL BE BRAINWASHED.

You are presenting your brain with information you know by its very essence is skewed and it is not hidden that is what it is. I am not inventing these things. Heck, Media Matters is a tax exempt orginization and THINK PROGRESS was set up by and for the Democratic party.

Then, to use that as a source on a political forum to make a point simply shows how naive and brainwashed you are.

I do not ever want to be that way. I respect people disagreeing with me but based on the facts and not spoon fed revised and mostly screened information.

Do the Republicans have such sites ? OF COURSE THEY DO. I see very little of them used to make a point on here and have just grown every frustrated with people using all these sites that are not even pretending to be news sites.

Fox is biased...ok.....but it is in fact a news orginization despite the cute little remarks that the sheep use on here use to describe them. I am not defending Fox in anyway and totally understand that their NON NEWS PROGRAMMING is skewed right.

What your point is I am not sure, but hope I clarified mine. Presenting things as news that are diatribes from a political party is sort of self degeneration of a sort. You simply admit you are brainwashed and have nothing to add from your own mind.

On the Benghazi question you raise, I think we have just begun with the questions and they will sharpen as more information is known. Ms Clinton is on the record on a number of things that she cannot take back. It was a political action, both hers and the Presidents and the commitee.

As I said, so what to the politics of the committee. Every black person shot by a white policeman is used by the Democratic party and the WH...every multiple shooting is used by anti gun people and if you are anywhere near as smart as you purport yourself to be, you know how it works. Benghazi committee was and is only part 1
It seems, sir, that you have no problem with the initial person making insulting remakes about someone, but have a problem with the person that responds in kind. If that is the way you want to play things, fine.

I have never read Media Matters. So, I have no idea what you are talking about. Why do you people always do this? Always try to place on someone that doesn't agree with you on the extreme. You always want to pigeonhole someone to the far left, that makes it easier to get your point across. You have a hard time dealing with a moderate independent, which I am, but very little problem dealing with a far left Democratic.

You watch Morning Joe. So, you heard that the only person asking questions that related to the Benghazi attacks was Representative Duckworth. Everybody else was either attacking Hillary Clinton, or defending her. There will be no sharper questions as the hearing goes on, just more political nonsense. That may include the Democrats walking out of the hearing. There is a big difference between using Benghazi as a political attack on your opponent, and gun violence as a trigger for stricter gun laws. What legislation s going to come out of the Benghazi hearing?

Back to the Republicans running for president, you watch Morning Joe, so you saw the interview with John Kasich. This is the fifth time I asked this question with no responses. What is wrong with John Kasich as the Republican's candidate for president? You had to see that he was a clear thinking, well informed, reasonable person running for president. He knows that he has to work with Democrats to get things done, and this makes him unacceptable as Republican candidate for president.