Originally Posted by Guest

Revisionist history, once again sans any facts

1. The impeachment proceedings against Clinton were based on perjury and bstruction of Justice, not his "cigaring" in the Oval Office.

Also to remind you, he and Hillary also lied to the entire nation right before his first election. He and Hillary both looked into those 60 Minute cameras and denied the entire Genifer Flowers item.

Good thing about his impeachment proceedings he finally admitted under oath that he lied, but that lie on 60 minutes is what got him elected.

If you think the Clintons first run at lying was in Washinton, you are very naive. Volumes on the Arkansas time, all proven and not denied.

They are accomplished liars.

2. You make the Democrats out like nice guys with Nixon and have no idea where you came up with that fantasy. Nixon, cheat and stupid bum he was, would have stayed as long as possible. He resigned because one single tape, a smoking gun, lost all his Republican support and he knew it was over.

3. The Bush talk is like the Obama talk and the new Clinton talk. Political rhetoric and that's it.

While you assessment of Democrats and Republicans is also an exercise in fantasy, it exposes nativity.

To answer your question about protestors, I refer you to the 1968 RIOTS IN THE STREETS of Chicago during the Democratic convention.

I would hope that some posters stop revising history to fit their narrative. There are enough real things to discuss without making things up or leaving things out.
.