Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovey2
Normally I hate the usual skepticism on this site, but on this particular thread, seems like we are all ready to have the dogs put down, the owner bankrupt, and no need for the actual "first hand" telling. How we know the dogs were abused, or not trained is beyond me. I'm VERY sorry for Lucy, and hope she recovers quickly, but also reserve judgement on the other pet owner and his dogs. They all must have been fairly close to each other..."several feet" is not that much when you're talking large dogs. Maybe all involved should have been more careful here?
|
I didn't see anything here that wants "the dogs put down", and "the owner bankrupt".
I think everyone wants that owner to be fined/sanctioned so he either learns to control his dogs or gives them to somebody who can, so that OTHER dogs and people do not get mauled, and are warned about the location!
As for "no need for the actual 'first hand' telling", that's not going to happen, and we don't need "first hand telling" when a responsible person alerts the rest of us about the location of vicious dogs that
have attacked passers-by.
Waiting for "first-hand telling" is ridiculous when an alert/warning is warranted.