Dear Guests:

It may be to some but not all pundits, nor even voters that Clinton is unstoppable. She continues to lead the Democrats candidates in the polls but just a cursory look tells you why. Sanders came to her rescue at the Democratic Debate and in return she attacked him or being a sexist.

Contributors know she is fatally flawed and that is causing great concern with the Democrat bigwig. Her default mode is to deceive.

Did she best the Republicans during the Benghazi Hearings? Or were the comments about her composure another validation of how she can lie without blinking an eye?

Consider that a know nothing came against her when she had all the big money contributors and she lost to him. She was thought to have been invincible then as now.

Consider that Clinton has moved so far left, if elected her presidency would represent an Obama third term, and as such she will have to own his legacy

She is playing the gender card but are women still buying that canard?

The polls consistently confirm that the majority of Americans find her untrustworthy.

Even some Democrats express concern because they view her as very polarizing and a candidate of the distant past

She shows contempt for the 1% with a blink because she has a long history of being cozy with Wall Street

As to news agency print, pixel or digital the issue should not be to defend any agency but demand from journalist or anyone claiming to represent a news agency to present objective and unbiased facts. Why is that so hard for some people to understand. Freedom of the press is no longer freedom if the truth tellers do not tell the truth. I can be as angry at a Fox News pundit has I can of a MSNBC pundit that try and push their bias down listeners throats.

Personal Best Regards: