Dear Guest:

You obviously are so invested in Hillary Clinton's election that you are willing to ignore her malfeasance. So I'll turn my comments elsewhere.

The attack by progressives on Fiorina's time as CEO of HP is being presented as a dichotomy . However too many people believe that the firing of CEO is the same as the firing of a file clerk. However at the level of CEO,the decisions made by CEO's are often based on long term planning. A CEO's relationship with the Board of Directors is important and if the chemistry is bad it is enough to end the relationship which has nothing to do with performance. In addition people at the senior management level get caught up in political quagmires not of their making. The progressives focus on what looked bad under her stewardship at a time when the entire economy was upside down but ignored the the strong gains that followed.

You gauge Fiorina's leadership skills based on her critics comments concerning HP.
However the mark of a leader is one who places his/her self interests behind the needs of the company and its employees. Creativity, honesty ethical behavior morality, intelligence in every aspect Fiorina has operated at high levels.

Contrast that to Hillary Clinton bona fides and she has only left a trail of failures, scandals and doubt as to her character.

If you are one of those whose only interest is in voting the first female president then please choose a qualified female. Because Clinton is not qualified and as I presented in a previous post on this thread she will only represent an Obama third term. And if you have a mind to spend sometime with statistics, etc and you will see that Obama's stewardship has been a total disaster by any measure

Personal Best Regards: