Rubio hit it "out of the park" with this....

"During the congressional hearing on Benghazi "it was revealed that Hillary Clinton knew early on and was telling her family and telling her friends that the attack on the consulate was by terrorists, al-Qaeda-like terrorists," Rubio said on CNN.

"The Clintons are nothing but masters of self-preservation," he added. "She was telling her relatives and friends early on that she clearly had doubts."

There was "never a single shred of evidence" that the attack was caused by a controversial video, an explanation that Clinton and Obama administration officials provided in the days after the attacks."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...morning-shows/

Even on this forum, many mentioned how she really stretched the truth and believablity during that hearing, and yet she and the media took a "victory lap".

Oh, but what she explained...

"Clinton called the changing narratives after the attacks a "fog of war" moment in her testimony before the hearing. "

The media asked a lot of "gotcha" questions last night and someday maybe someone will go after this woman on FACTS. She has been either the principle involved or an auxiliary to, so many many investigations. She have been proven a liar and yet.......well, let us wait until next year and hope that in general election someone steps up before the Republican candidate does and asks the tough questions.

Her selection of interviews and, if you read you know the conditions placed by her campaign on what she will talk about, ability and it is an ability to lie and twist things and then giggle and laugh at anyone who dares call her on her lies.

Some of the books written by close associates and even secret service folks mention that cackle and how she turns on anyone who calls her on her lies.