Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Can you be a bit more specific please.
Are you speaking of the new budget proposal that the parties settled on ?
Or, are you speaking of candidate proposals thus far ?
I have read your post a few times and find it difficult without some specific areas to respond to.
You mention tax plans....that would be the candidates speaking.
You mention military spending...that would be the new compromise agreement.
You mention not cutting social programs...that would be the new compromise or in a very general sense, the candidates.
You mention principles....that could be either.
Tough to reply without you giving some specifics.
I would love to see intelligent debate on this subj.ect as it is a weak are for me and I want to learn more.
|
No, I am speaking about the 1920 budget, and the effects that it had back then. Sometimes common sense applies. When you have to explain everything in great detail, no one here is going to listen. Take a look at the posts. The majority are one or two sentences long. The fact of the matter here people don't want to reply only attack.
Take a look at the threads. There was a Republican debate last night, and there isn't one thread on the board about it. Any Republican on Republican disagreement is avoided at all costs here. I started a post several weeks ago when two Republicans went at each other on Meet the Press, and it died a quick death.
Anytime you try to go into great detail, you are accused of changing the subject. You may be the exception, but the others will join the conversation, and it will be brought down to the gutter in one big hurry.