Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
That's quite naive, Chi. Of course it was a conspiracy. They conspired to make the questions personal. They didn't want the public to know what the policies were of the candidates. They wanted to make the candidates look irrelevant and unappealing. They asked stupid questions, not related to policies at all.
What I would like to see is a list of questions published that had each candidates' position on it. Publish it in a newspaper of on a central website for all to view. Then, the moderators could ask for details on these issues and get the candidates to tell us why their program would be more appealing than the other candidate's. This cr@p about asking personal questions is nothing more than character assassination. If they were truthful about it, then they would have asked Hilary about her felony viloation regarding her classified material on her unsecured and unauthorized server, and ask her why she lied to everyone about Benghazi. They would have asked Sanders where/how he planned to fund his extravagant entitlement program. Not letting him off the hook by saying "the rich will pay for it. " Details. They tried to tell the GOP candidates that their tax plans wouldn't work, but they didn't ask any details of the DNC candidates, other than "do black lives matter?" What a stupid question.
|
My point was the RNC's name is all over the debates Reince Priebus should be on the hot seat. All three debates had poor moderating with CNBC being the worse.