Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
If she was to get elected, she can't repeal it. She can sign a law, passed by both houses of Congress, to repeal it but she herself can't do it unilaterally. This is a point most people miss when they listen to candidates: they can say anything they want but without a law being passed by Congress they can't do much, the executive order overreach by the current administration notwithstanding.
|
The problem with your logic is Republicans want to get rid of Dodd Frank. She isn't out there pushing this like Republicans with Obamacare. The problem with this comment is Republicans can push it through Congress, and force her to backup up her statement. Given her nature, she will do the Clinton two step, and say I wouldn't have bailed them out then, but given history it was the right thing to do. If anyone doesn't think that she would say anything to get elected, they haven't been looking.
The fact of the matter this is politics 101, say anything or do anything to get elected. You can have the best ideas in the world. If you don't get elected, what good are they? Then you run for reelection on your record. She has taken this course numerous times, and also every advanced course on the subject.
Why are you asking about Hillary's nature? You know all her answers are politically acceptable to the majority of voters, whether she believes them or not. Is there anyone out there campaigning for the presidency that wouldn't do the same thing? Take a good look at the immigration debate, haven't several of them danced away from a previous position? Morals are a bridge to far in or on your way to Washington.