So if we assume they would complete/build the wall.
That they begin enforcing the law and attempt to eliminate illegal entry.

That would send the message that we mean business.
Once these are either in place or on the way as part of a plan that will get it done, talking about going after the illegals already here adds to the resolve being placed on no illegals to be tolerated....enforce the laws.

Maybe they are smart enough to not say how or where because they know there will be some common sense applied to application of the law to those already here. And there will be varying categories of them requiring possible different solutions. However the common denominator will be they have to do something to get from where they are to being LEGAL!!!!

So I would not be so quick to jump to conclusion they literally mean herd 'em up and round 'em up! Some might think in a narrow chanel and pursue it that way.

What they are doing in communicating NO MORE ILLEGALS ALLOWED!

Why should they compromise up front....they have the majority on their side to eliminate illgal immigration. That the laws of the land will be enforced. The exceptions, if any, will come as part of an overall plan.

The clamour to round 'em up is nothing but a scare tactic. One for the illegals. The other for the opposition to hope to gather more votes.

So how about a discussion of the merits of eliminating illegal immigration?