Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I have said many times on here that it runs both ways.
I also have said, even repeated it this morning, that the liberal/progressive/socialist is so much better at it. They control the mass media, not speaking strictly of the news networks, but the social media.
Heck, there are a number of websites around to support the 9/11 victim bill. Now, I support that bill, but there are so many website where you can get form letters to use wherever you want (we have on on this forum). They give money not just to candidates, but to causes (see the money given to Black Lives Matter); They have an innate ability to push more lenient voting rules.
All is not bad except, in that movement in my opinion it has become the norm instead of a supplement. Republican and conservatives are not in that class of of yet.
It is a compliment...just read this forum, then track down where folks get inaccurate information and you will see that the liberal/progressive/socialist movement are the driving force, to your point not the only one, but certainly the driving force on this medium.
|
The Democrats could control the social media, but does it do them any good? Isn't it the young crowd that inhabits the social media, and they as a rule don't vote in large numbers? I am just asking, because I don't go on social media sites. I am not sure what you would classify a social media sites.
Isn't Trump living on the social media? Given the amount of time that he is spending on mass media, and social media, I am surprised that the other candidates aren't asking for equal time.