Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Town
OK, thanks for the clarification.
|
You are welcome.
http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp...rodt_Final.pdf
I had Donald Marshall for Evidence and Torts.
Hard but fair teacher.
I remember that he was one of the University of Minnesota Law Professors fighting for me when I brought up my interest in practical information for survivors/victims of crimes in January of 1991. I got hit with subtle and not so subtle attacks on my mental health from January through September of 1991 by some of the people at the University of Minnesota Law School/Library. The Professors were very split on what to do about me as have many people in institutions I have tried to get involved in my 224 613 Project.
I did not start calling it that until mid-1993. I mean the 224 613 Project after I had been #613 in a study on stress on the unemployed at the University of California San Francisco Health Sciences Campus where I talked about all these experiences up to then with an interviewer/researcher in four taped sessions.
Each community is different though as what is available for survivors/victims in the Twin Cities is going to be different from what is there for them in Lake, Sumter, and Marion counties in the Villages' area.
Facebook allows me to contact people in hundreds of communities about this 224 613 Project.
And I am involved, of course, in pushing this in Reno, Nevada; the Twin Cities; Denver; Phoenix; Provo, Utah; and many other places. Mostly though I am trying to do it in places I have lived which of course involves the Villages, FL; Palm Harbor, FL; Rohnert Park, CA; Belmont, CA; Scottsdale, AZ; Menomonee Falls, WI; Itasca, IL, etc.
Professor David Weissbrodt was another one of the Law Professors who seemed to be on my side at least his Teaching Assistant around 1991 told me to never give up on this fight, which I have not. Hard for Professor Weissbrodt to support me back then as he flunked me in Moot Court because I sort of defended the wrong person in my brief in an extremely complicated disabilities case which even seemed to confuse some of the Judges hearing us Students presenting it.