Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Knowing I will be called a liberal weenie I still have to agree with almost all your post. A number of posters in this forum are still living in the 80's and the country no longer has the manufacturing to pull us out of this poor economy. The only reason it is as good as it is now is because of deficiet spending, nothing else. Those who are promising more tax cuts are pandering, that card has been played already. Where I do disagree with you is what will swing this election. I think more something for nothing will win as it usually does, Americans don't like to pay their own way. IMO
|
Hate to be stupid but you agree with WHAT ?
The question was "Why do voters put so much stock in economic performance when economists say the President does not affect it ?"
Neither all knowing or you responded to it ? Both of you went right to the same place, and I was trying to keep it out of the party realm.
Trust me, you may feel as if everyone here is in the 80's but as someone who is an avid reader, I specifically asked the question because we are NOT in the 80's, and posts were made about both parties and two Presidents and how they either started something or ended something.