Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Hate to be stupid but you agree with WHAT ?
The question was "Why do voters put so much stock in economic performance when economists say the President does not affect it ?"
Neither all knowing or you responded to it ? Both of you went right to the same place, and I was trying to keep it out of the party realm.
Trust me, you may feel as if everyone here is in the 80's but as someone who is an avid reader, I specifically asked the question because we are NOT in the 80's, and posts were made about both parties and two Presidents and how they either started something or ended something.
|
This forum is primarily a bash Obama site. Where you started your so called unbias question with the word liberal it kind of sets the tone, don't you think. Believe me there are some of us whom are conservative and think Bush 43 did much more damage to this economy than Obama but understand he had a lot of help. So I guess we agree the economy was toast before Obama got it and there is really not much he can do.