Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
This forum is primarily a bash Obama site. Where you started your so called unbias question with the word liberal it kind of sets the tone, don't you think. Believe me there are some of us whom are conservative and think Bush 43 did much more damage to this economy than Obama but understand he had a lot of help. So I guess we agree the economy was toast before Obama got it and there is really not much he can do.
|
1. If you read the OP I typed that I was challenged to begin a thread that had no intent to bash Obama and that was the intent. It was about as neutral as you can get. The question I asked
DID NOT contain the word liberal. Here it is once again...
"Why do voters put so much stock in economic performance when economists say the President does not affect it ?"
2. I will give you guys credit for twisting anything to protect St. Obama. This is not the first thread that has been twisted this way. I am not accusing you because not sure who you are however I think I know but not for sure. You are one of the group who thinks everything is for fun and games. So enjoy your selfs and keep PMing between you all giggling like little girls.