Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I already posted a link to the FBI definition of terrorist perhaps you missed that... so here is the definition.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”Sep 13, 2011
Perhaps the only deference between him and the Paris terrorists was the face he as NOT yelling allahu akbar so thanks for helping to make my point.
The attack on Paris and this attack were terrorist attacks!!!!
|
Maybe, but maybe not. You don't know for sure until you find out what his motive(s) was/were. Note that the definition that you use, does not include the religious element, ie. ISIS. You also left out much of the definition. But, you look at it in your skewed way and I will look at it realistically and logically. As far as I am concerned (not knowing all the facts) he was a mass murderer, acting on his own for his own personal reasons. According to you, Black Lives Matter would be a terrorist organization. The Wall St protesters would be terrorists. But, not the Tea Party because they do not use force.