Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
This time I am correct....
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”Sep 13, 2011
He targeted PP (a property)
Was armed with an assault rifle and propane tanks (force and violence)
Said no more body parts (political objective)
Meets the FBI definition......
|
You are wrong. It does NOT fit the definition of Terrorism. You are attempting to stretch the issue and make it a political statement. It is NOT political. It is not terrorism. He was a wacko with anger issues, period.
If you think this is an act of terrorism, then I guess you would try to convince us that these school shootings are terrorism also. But, you are wrong, either way. You cut a little blurb out from some FBI statement that isn't even complete.
But, if you wish to get hysterical over this and yell that the sky is falling, then you can go hang out with Chicken Little.