Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
As disenchanted as one might be, he, Trump would be the better choice between him or Clinton.
And you may be suffering a little from the current way people are used to being communicated with by politicians....telling you what you want to hear....talkiking nice nice about everything.....calling a spade a heart because it sounds better....or may not offend someone......etc.
A lot of what is referred to as Trump's bluster is he says it like it is and too many do not like it that way. HOWEVER....there are many of us that subscribe to saying it like it is because it is usually the truth!!! That is the very reason Trump resonates so well with the American people......yes, including many democrats who are sick and tired of being schmoozed by the crony sleeze business as usual politicians which Obama and Clinton are the self annointed king and queen.
|
No...explain...
What does it mean when his plan for ISIS is to bomb the hell out of them ? He needs congressional approval among other thing but he never mentions that. Has he not the common sense to understand the consequences of that ?
What does it mean when he says, I will be the best trade president ever...don't worry about it ? How ?
What does it mean constantly "don't worry about it" and he offers nothing..nada.
What does it mean when he obviously had no clue what the question even meant on our nuclear reaction capabilities ? Rubio saved his bacon on that, and I challenge you to tell me one canidate for any federal office that has no clue about this.
This man is dangerous, and don't even think about blaming me for not being used to his rhetoric. It is unintelligible drivel, and he is not nor will be the king...he cannot simply ordain things.
He is slowly and surely draining the Republican Party of its viability, and if he does not do well at any time he will simply turn on the party. That is who he is and what he is. He can get away with bluster, etc in private business, but he has that darn Constitution to worry about outside business.
Your attempt to defend him by blaming intelligent citizens and voters for not understanding is simply ludicrious