If you read my comment, I did comment on the information contained in that article. Even though it is slanted, I agreed that vetting the candidate is a good thing. My comment about the slant of the article and the comparison of it to the Huffington Post, was just an observation/opinion. If the loan that Cruz obtained is an issue, then it should be examined. I also believe that Hillary's involvement with her email regarding private donations and it's relevance to it being on a work related server to be important too. I believe that Hillary's finances should also be examined.

I have no objection to the candidates being vetted, and never have. As long it is legitimate vetting and not a witch hunt, such as giving a haircut type hazing in high school, or lying by the head Senator about someone not paying their taxes.