Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
True BUT, the EPA is one of Obama's favorite radical tools that everyone else wants to get rid of. This is not the first time within the past year for the EPA to have been involved in a problem that they should have handled more appropriately. It seems like in the past two terms, this administration has done almost everything they attempted in a half-@ss manner. Just saying. Maybe if this administrator could concentrate on just one agenda, he could achieve something successfully......other than dividing the country racially. He did succeed in that.
|
"the EPA is one of Obama's favorite radical tools that everyone else wants to get rid of." If you are referring to everyone as people that have their heads so far up their asses that nothing in the environment can affect them, you hit the nail right on the head.
The change in water supply was a costing cutting matter designed to save the cash strapped city of Flint millions. Instead, it is going to cost the state, and federal government millions, and children are going to suffer. Which party is always on the kick to save money?
The EPA screwed up. So, you want to get rid of them. What the hell do you think would happen nationwide, if you got rid of the EPA, and environmental regulations. You don't think that companies would do the same thing that the Flint city regulator did? Let's cut costs to hell with the environment. Our bottom line is more important that peoples' health.
You are right about that racial thing. Obama told the EPA to back off, so blacks could play the race card ,and be right in doing so. We know that everything that Obama does is meant to bring down this country, and the best way to do that is start a race war.