The one troll on here is supporting Clinton(s) and has only slurs to defend her/them with. Not one shred of evidence that she would make a decent leader, especially a competent president. On the other hand, when presented with facts, he is in denial and refuses concrete evidence showing how complicit she is in criminal/corrupt activity. And he suggests that anyone that doesn't agree with him is crazy. Friend, I believe that you are on the wrong forum if you think that anyone on here would support your fanatical/biased view of the Clintons.

By the way, this thread is supposed to be about the trolls attempt to disparage candidate Fiorina. So, I will make my comment related to that issue. Fiorina has conducted a poorly managed campaign strategy and has not received the public recognition required to get her message across. It's probably her fault and the fault of her campaign managers. Her desperation has shown in the brief periods of media attention she has received.

In my opinion, she was unfairly shut out of the debate when she out performed at least two other candidates that were allowed in the debate. But, it IS up to the organizing as to how many and which candidates are allowed to participate. Even though she was discriminated upon, it is a Free country and we do have Free Enterprise. If the media doesn't want someone, then that's just their tough luck. Unfair? Yes. Legal? Yes. If she doesn't agree, she can always fund her own debate. Actually, if she had a good campaign manager, she should be able to get some good traction out of this incident. But, if she had a good campaign manager, she would have been in the debate.

Just my two cents. Is copper worth anything today?