Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I give Christie credit for calling Rubio out on an obvious amateur memorization routine that was terribly executed. God for Christie for saying on stage what most of us were wondering anyway.
As far as Rubio being cited as the best candidate to beat Clinton, I would like to hear from those who pronounce that explaining just why that is supposed to be the case.
In my opinion if Trump is the republican candidate and Clinton lasts long enough and the people stupid enough to have her as their choice....then there is no better candidate to do what needs to be done to defeat her.
I also think if those would turn out to be the choices it would be Clinton's and the democratic party's worst nightmare.
Christie did what he does sorta Trump-like...no politics....full in your face challenge......
Rubio would be a light weight that would fold under the Clinton mean machine...he is a bit too political......better than Clinton by light years.
|
Christie was being his usual AH. He is like a bully that has to have his way because he is bigger and uglier than the rest of the school kids. He knew he was on his way out and decided to take someone with him. Rubio sounds like he is memorizing his statements, but the reality he is a decent speaker and can put two sentences together and not sound like a dock worker, like Trump and Christie sound. Nothing against their manner of speaking but, why is it a crime for an intelligent person to speak intelligently? Yes, he did repeat himself. He had to with Christie interrupting him and taunting him like a schoolyard bully.
Rubio put them all to shame later in the debate when he left them all behind with his knowledge of national security and terrorism. That is probably more important than Christie lying to everyone about how he is going to put Hillary in jail. As if he could.
Yes, Christie was a contributing factor in Romney's failure to win. Christie is the type of friend that you don't turn your back on.