Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Your second paragraph is off the mark. 2/3 of Democratic voters want single payer. 60% of Democratic voters are college graduates. These voters are not lazy or misinformed. New Hampshire is not Mississippi, or Louisiana. These people work or they would freeze, or stave to death.
Single payer isn't a redistribution of wealth. It is health insurance for everyone. It is never going to happen. It is campaign nonsense. The same as building a wall and Mexico will pay for it, 45% tariff, deport all illegal immigrants, or repealing Obamacare on their first day holding office. Stupidity isn't the sole beneficiary of either party. It is bipartisan.
|
Dear Guest: allow me to offer another point of view concerning this subject.
Once long ago in another era single payer health care was a way to expand access to the relative few things medical care could do for patients and hence it had appeal. Today the single payer system Sanders offers prospective voters would not expand access it would only serve to deny and limit care in order to control spending.
Obamacare gave many corporations the cover they needed to remove themselves from offering medical care as a benefit. Obama's excessive and unnecessary regulations have had a serious affect on the business environment and the economy. business people will not invest under these circumstances . say what you will but socialism by any other name Obamacare, climate change, income inequality single payer is a method of income redistribution.
And I'll put myself out there further by predicting that if Sanders prevails the only way he is going to be able to continue his insane push of socialism is by transforming this nation to a police state via laws. Unlike Denmark, etc where people only take what they need too many Americans have an affinity for free stuff and an entitlement mentality that tells them they can take as much as they like
Some one like Thomas Sowell or Jason Riley will explain that all the free stuff white liberals gave to blacks had an inverse effect. Golf is a game of contradictions and so is the issue of free stuff. It robs people of incentive and motivation and increases their demands for more entitlements.
Why do liberals continue to ignore the limits of nature and /or nature's natural laws?