Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
The problem with E. Warren's comment is she doesn't go far enough. The Constitution also says that the nominee has to be approved by the Senate. The problem with our current state of politics is there is no middle ground. If Obama puts forward a moderate, and two have been mentioned, how are the Republicans going to sell the idea that the Supreme Court just went to the left?
Both sides are trying to sell the idea that the nominee should be in line with their political philosophy. Isn't the Supreme Court suppose to be a non bias check and balance against the other two sides of government? The judges are suppose to rule on the case brought to them in a non bias manner, and enforce the law as written. Well, it appears neither party wants that to happen.
Judge Roberts, and Kennedy are raked over the coals every time they rule against the Republican leaning judges. It is a real hard sell for Republicans to throw out there that they want a middle of the road judge. In some cases. we have two.
|
Good post, even if I don't completely agree with it.
You have one difficult premise. You gave a hypothetical situation that is way too incredulous. You suggest that Obama would submit a nominee that is moderate. Obama is so far to the left that he makes Hillary appear conservative.