The term really should be "anthropogenic climate change" but the anthropogenic part is usually omitted. The impact of man's activities is somewhere between "some" and a "sh**load". That is the fundamental question that is trying to be answered. The good news is the system is inherently stable so a runaway condition is unlikely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedquick
I am a believer in climate change. In fact I believe that it’s been changing, constantly, since the world was created nearly 4.5 billion years ago.
While I believe that man may have “some” effect on the climate the simple fact that in the 70’s it was climate cooling, then warming and once it seemed unlikely that it was realistically provable in either direction, it became “climate change”, concerns me. The fact that the urgency used to be about cooling, then warming and now simply change, makes me suspect of the screamers true intent. Since I believe it is “much ado about nothing”, I am emphatically untrusting of those pushing the agenda.
|