Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
So far the thread participants demonstrate they would rather attack and disparage each other than participate in the question and subject at hand.
Seems to be a pattern for some.
My first suggestion is the candidate shall not be a law trained, legal profession, lawyer.
Secondly the candidate shall not be a career politician (of the cronyism ilk).
The candidate should have a record of accomplishment; actually show measured and quantified accomplished as a direct result of their initiative.
A reasonable understanding of business especially accounting and finances.
The candidate must be able to demonstrate how well they have performed; promises made VS promises kept.
Just for starters.
|
The person that you are describing would probably be the head of a major corporation. The problem is why would anyone in that position want anything to do with career politicians that mostly likely have law degrees. If you haven't noticed, has any politician especially running for president ever admitted that he/she has done anything wrong.
The person that you described is Mitt Romney. His brief dabble in politics was governor of Mass. If anything, that should be a plus, because he had to deal with Democrats every day. Democrats had a super majority in Mass. There were some days where Romney was the only Republican in the State House.