Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.
Here's my question to Trum supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about to discover the background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history and opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?
|
So, what you want is to elect a professor as president. We already have a wannabe professor in there. A professor in claim only. And you don't have any problem with his geography knowledge. 57 States doesn't say much for his knowledge of our country. Of course, he seems to have a good grasp of the Muslim countries. That should tell you something.
Perhaps you would wish that a candidate first graduate from a presidential career course? The problem with that is that there is no such prerequisite in the Constitution stipulating these type of requirements. All you need to worry about is whether or not he gets enough electoral votes. It doesn't even have to be a popular vote majority.