Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.
Here's my question to Trum supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about to discover the background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history and opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?
|
Now you know that is not fair....and you are just poking a stick at the badger....right?
We all know that Sanders and for sure Clinton would fail.
We also know that Obama would not have made it to the nomination.
The choices these days are very simple.
If any voter wants the establishment, the beurocracy, the cronyism ejected from Washington it must start with electing a non political, non insider, anti establishment, non beholding person to be president.
All others are nothing more than a continuation of the cronyism and political beurocracy and bloat that is the establishment of today....that being both R & D.
So the choices shake out pretty simply given the above.