Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Have you no friends that have a "Poor Steve" or "Poor John"? Those are the names they start every sentence about them with, it is almost like that "Poor" is part of the name on the birth certificate. Most have been a screw up since day one and most of those sentences refer to occasions about DUIs and other abuse and legal problems. The parent of "Poor Steve" has excuses after excuse about it being someone else's fault, like "Poor Steve got hooked on drugs cause he dated that one girl" or "Poor Steve got in a car accident last night, he was coming home from the bar and some guy stopped too quick in front of him".
Well, the reason I asked is; those people usually send "Poor Steve" to rehab a couple times and a lot of times they realize he is unfix-able. This is after they have spent 20K or more on a couple stints at rehab centers (average cost is 10-20K).
That leads me to; who can afford to pay 10 -20K for each of these "Poor Steve"s we have in this country? And then they have a relapse and then spend another 10-20K?
STOCK UP ON AMMO!
|
Rehab for people not paying taxes is not the same as rehab for people addicted to drugs. People that aren't paying federal income taxes are making next to nothing. So, the cure is a better job. Rehab is a two year associate's degree, or training for a job in the trades. Education is rehab. A better job is more addicting than making peanuts. So, you are not likely to fall back into the 47% category.
People receiving social security are part of the 47%. Receiving SS checks is a disease that is not curable. So, we will not be sent to rehab.