Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Actually, the gist of the post was nobody is equal to anybody else. We're all different and each has their own strengths and weaknesses. We should use those differences to our advantage and not fight nature.
What part wasn't true?
What part wasn't true? You slam someone, call them a name, back it up. What wasn't true?
Why should someone who refuses to work, eat? Why should some people be allowed to live off of another's labor? Why should we be forced to work for others?
The country ISN'T going down hill? Isn't going down in world rankings? There aren't more minority children than white children entering public school? This won't effect the entire country and our way of life?
WHAT part isn't true?
Why is it racist to speak the truth?
There's only a right to "free speech" if it agrees with you. Agrees with your ideology. Isn't hurtful. Doesn't blame anyone.
|
It didn't work for our earliest form of socialism, the Mayflower Compact, or in Jamestown in the 1600's.
"The aphorism is found in the Second Epistle of Paul the Apostle (with Silvanus and Timothy) to the Thessalonians, in which Paul writes:
εἴ τις οὐ θέλει ἐργάζεσθαι μηδὲ ἐσθιέτω
that is,
If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat"
Of course, then you have the socialist view:
"Leon Trotsky wrote that: "The old principle: who does not work shall not eat, has been replaced with a new one: who does not obey shall not eat." (this is probably more on the level of Bernie Sanders view too)