Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Do what though? None of Donald Trump's proposals --or most of them-- seem remotely practical. And I do not like gross over generalizations about Members of Congress. There are some rather bad politicians in Washington like Ted Cruz and his very selfish actions of stopping the government from running but the Donald seems far worse with respect to out-of-touch with reality arrogance and narcissism. Bernie Sanders' policies also seem quite far-fetched. That leaves Clinton as the only viable choice. Not an enthusiastic one in the least.
|
OK so there are some good 'guys' in congress. What did they do to make congress perform better and be more responsive to the needs of America and we the people. Certainly not enough to make a difference. Out numbered by the bad guys.
As far as out of touch reality, once again those adjectives very amply describe almost ever member of congress. They are the "political party". They and their re-elction come first. Their special interest and minority group supporters come second. And America and we the people are some where on the latter pages of the list of priorities.
And as for the conclusion that Clinton is viable. I can only conclude your politics and required party loyalties dictate the decision. It certainly is not based on character, morals or qualifications. She is the poster child of the ' bad guys' that currently run Washington.
The choices being made are more fundamental than too many will allow.
It is either vote for more of the same, the establishment, = Clinton.
Or vote for an outsider and hope to have some change and shake up of the establishment = Trump.
And if America was willing to take a chance on an unknown, black, activist, community organizer to bring hope and change.....there should be no hesitation what so ever to take a chance on Trump delivering what Americans want. Shake the hell out of the do nothing establishment comprised of both the D and R incumbents.