Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Personal attacks on politicians is free game. Personal attacks on fellow posters, not so much and unmannerly. I always respect your comments, but perhaps we disagree on this one. It's all in fun, my friend.
|
Quite honestly I did not see my post as an attack on posters but a rejection of this type of response but then I can see how you could come to that conclusion. You will also note that I made reference that they were feeling their oats meaning caught up in it all as people sometimes do.
Having said that I still believe such comments place us all at a disadvantage because instead of addressing a candidates political deficits ( ie policy, bona fides) these personal attacks( looks, dress,etc) are taking the low road and damage credibility for those of us that align.
It is in my nature to come to the defense of those with physical deficits , disabilities, etc . We had a neighborhood kid who stuttered my friends would poke fun at him. I was the only guy on the block that told my friends to knock it off or I knocked them down. I have defended people who were ridiculed solely based on their race color disability my entire life.
Hillary's looks dress are not the issue. Benghazi, personal e mail server Clinton Charitable Foundation are all fair game. We can only beat the opposition with civil and intellectual discourse because Americans value fairness
Personal Best Rgards: