A reporter is not a subject matter expert. A liberal rag is not credible to give an unbiased opinion.

NO MALICE is required to have broken the law. But, she did have intent as evidence is in her emails to her minions, instructing them to remover classification marking before sending them to her. Even then, intent would not be necessary. The fact that classified information was removed from a secure network and distributed via a non-secure network is evidence of a broken law.

WP suggests that a hacker that plead guilty of hacking into her system/server didn't really do it, is ludicrous.

But, you liberals keep believing in republican conspiracies and UFOs and misuse your privilege to vote by voting for another radical, criminal in this case. Also a liar and a thief, as well as a tax fraud.