[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by blueash

No those cannot fairly be interchanged.

https://pibillwarner.files.wordpress...8/untitled.jpg to see 9-11 terrorists

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/files/2...ks-suspect.jpg Paris ringleader

https://www.fbi.gov/news/news_blog/i...ammed-deceased Tanzania embassy

http://www.trbimg.com/img-54026997/t...state-20140830 Fort Hood

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...ns-suspect.jpg Boston bombers

http://www.epictimes.com/12/08/2015/...-the-shooting/ San Bernadino

and of course Orlando

No or minimal beards, Western clothing. But some people form opinions, or pre-judge situations, despite evidence completely contradictory to their sincerely held personal observations. So religious garb may indicate religious but it does NOT indicate radicalized.

I personally think that most are the better for having religious beliefs, and traditions, but I do not agree with those that think that infidels are better off dead.

Now you can say that Catholics are taught that it is a sin to use birth control, which is almost universally ignored, but one seems far more dangerous than the other. I will continue to use my marker for folks in Burqas, (sp) actually more because it appears to me to be a way to subjugate women. It offends me although I thought nothing of nuns dressing almost identically in my youth. We change. We have opinions and we debate. But most of us would never kill another unless they were trying to do terrible harm to themselves or their families.