Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - AR-15 style rifles
View Single Post
 
Old 06-15-2016, 06:57 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And the Regressives wonder why they will lose the Presidential election!
They've been bred out of the majority by the minorities.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I have no issue with banning AR-15 rifles.

But what would be the discussion if the killer used an explosive vest? Or poison gas? Or drove his car into the club? Or set fire to the place? Or used a pressure cooker bomb?

Could we then freaking figure out that we need to control 18-30 year old radical Muslims!!!!
We need to ban 18-30 minorities too. THAT is where the problems originate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Once again, the Regressive redirects to a "what if" situation.

What are you going to do? Build interrment camps for all Muslims - even American born Muslims?
A dangerous group is a dangerous group. Ban mosques, where they're radicalized, and hopefully they'll go away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Sounds like a libtard, acting like restricting a radical group is such a big deal. It has been done before. You want to ban a stupid gun that isn't even a military weapon. Just another of a multitude of guns that a RADICAL used to kill. So, if up to you, we would punish the gun instead of the killer, IF that was possible. You are so afraid of Muslims that you fear their anger if you say anything against them.

Libtards are so stupid that they think that by getting rid of one gun, it's going to stop the killing. They forget about bombs and they forget about Paris recently. You know, the place where they have strict gun control?

Try to get it through your heads, liberals. AR-15 is not a military weapon and it is NOT an assault weapon. The M-16 is the military assault weapon. The AR-15 just looks like one. It does not operate like one.

My son-in-law has a Glock 9mm semi-automatic pistol. He has a 30 round magazine. It is not an assault weapon, but it has the same ability as the AR-15 to kill 30 people before reloading. I have a S&W 9mm pistol with a 16 round magazine. Many shotguns are semi-automatic and they even sell some that look like military weapons. Are you going to ban all semi-automatic weapons? Does that mean that my six shot 357 magnum is ok? Because with speed loaders, I can reload faster than some folks with semi-automatic pistols.

Please, will one libtard speak up and explain exactly how far you will go to limit the 2nd Amendment. And by the way, technically by the 2nd Amend. we should be able to have any weapon that the military has. After all, it is there to protect us from an over reaching government.
We're also supposed to be "allowed" to form local "well regulated militias". Look how well that has gone. They're treated like an enemy. Because they ARE an enemy to the liars and thieves running government.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Ideally you [and all like minded people] want to be armed with automatic weapons just like our Military just in case our Military is ordered to attack you will have equal firing power. Is that right? How about a tank? Do you want one of those too?

And it's reasonable for someone, a Muslim in this case to be on a FBI watch list and not restrict selling any weapon he wants to purchase because that might be the slippery slope of total gun control. Is that right?
Who creates the "watch list" and under what criteria? It seem ANYONE can be added to this "list" and then denied basic civil rights. Don't believe all the propaganda.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
No you just don't let Muslims in the country
until they have been vetted, especially
if they come from countries that supports
terrorist activities. Is that really hard to understand.
If it is, you are definitely a Libtard!
Just don't let them in period. What GOOD will they add? What value? None that I can see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
A government is more apt to be tyrannical if the people are not able to bear arms.
Tanks are not necessary since History has shown,
that a smaller number of armed people can change a country's course!
The difference between a citizen and a slave is a citizen can defend themselves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Why didn't you answer my questions?
I'll agree to voter ID.
And you'll lose half the D voters. Hopefully. They're becoming the majority, so this may be our last hope.