Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Hillary has released her tax returns but you could not find anything wrong so you keep insinuating about other things, no facts just garbage. Trump is ashamed of his tax return, but what can you expect from a con man and entertainer.
|
Where's the Clinton Foundation tax returns? You know, the ones where the Clintons are being investigated for tax fraud? I am "insinuating other things?" No, I am just mentioning the FACTS that the Clinton Foundation is being investigated by the IRS, Hillary is being investigated by the FBI regarding her illegal use of a personal email server for gov business. Something that NO ONE else has ever done. A practice that could have/ DID jeopardize national security. She violated federal felony laws regarding mishandling of classified information. She also took donations from foreign entities and funneled them through the Clinton foundation. She is a pathological liar, but many attribute that to being a politician and a former lawyer. Hillary was fired after she "..wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents." during the Nixon Watergate investigation. She gave a speech the other day about how her foundation does so much but left out that only about 8% of the funds goes toward helping anyone but the Clintons.
All of this is easily verified on the Internet, if one wishes to "open their mind" to the truth. It is not a Republican conspiracy that the Clintons are always involved in so much controversy and illegal activity. But, it does make one wonder what they have on so many people that they can get away with it and still garner support for votes, as well as funding from Wall St and such radicals as George Soros, the socialist, and the very rich individuals in the Middle East.
Would you like to do a comparison study between Hillary and The Donald to see which side tips the scale in corruption and illegal activity?
After all, how can anyone trust someone to run the government that doesn't understand the concept of email, handling classified material or properly reporting their taxes? Who would trust a commander-in-chief that does not have enough loyalty to attempt a rescue when her DIRECT subordinates/employees lives are being threatened?
Just wondering what kind of person could find it conscionable to vote for such a person to represent the best country in the world.