Quote:
Originally Posted by champion6
You need to be specific regarding the locations of these signs. After all, TV stretches into 3 counties. Each jurisdiction has its own budget and priorities.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthOfTheBorder
Where 
Thanks
Don |
Almost anywhere that is north of 466A and south of 466, a person that is paying even a modicum of attention will notice a large number of ratty signs.
North of 466 is older and yet a rough approximation tells me that the signs are wearing better, but there are still more poor ones than would be expected.
Here's an idea, let's let this thread run a few days and those reading it start paying attention to every single street sign they see and then come back and state that they don't see a higher % of signs that are looking pretty poor than there should be given their age?
Or are y'all expecting me to drive around and take a plethora of photo's proving my point, that some would still argue with?
As I said in my original post, I don't know who is responsible for the signs, but I will bet right now that if it is the developer the usual suspects will quickly jump in and say there's hardly any that are failing.
Wanna bet?
