|
07-19-2016, 09:09 AM
|
|
Gold member
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,130
Thanks: 184
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by outlaw
How can a municipality or the TV recreation center ban someone because they are litigious? One would think that, as a taxpayer/amenities payer, he would have to be compensated for the loss of these amenities. It's not a safety issue. It seems to just be an inconvenience issue. Why not counter sue this guy for legal expenses if his suits are frivolous? What if Lady Lake decides they want to ban him from driving on their roads? Strange.
|
my point exactly.......
|