Confronting people who may have been drinking only has downside. Creating a ruckus that might encourage bystanders to go elsewhere to spend money only has downside. Seat saving is only an issue with a few popular groups. Regardless of what you think, there is little chance of any change as the "shirted" people are not going to confront people over seat saving. People aren't going to argue when approached about safety issues - whole different issue - and there are cops around if people refuse to comply with safety issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by outlaw
The upside is the policy would be adhered to. The downside risk is minimal in my opinion. Do you see water volleyball participants cut the line to get in, or pickleball players cutting the line. No. Why not? They know they couldn't get away with it. If the staff can enforce safety issues without violence, why assume they can't enforce other developer policies without violence? It's illogical.
|