Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You and I think at least one other Republican didn't watch the clip. It is obvious.
That's the difference and just one point the poster was making.
You take pride in the fact that liberals watch your "unbiased" cable news source. You or maybe someone else on the boards take pride in not watching the clip the liberal provided. They don't have to see it to know what it's about.
Open minded people want to hear and see everything and not just stick their head in the sand or in Fox News show.
|
You are assuming a lot. First off, I never said FOX news was unbiased. You liberals enjoy putting words that you like in other folk's mouths. Secondly, why do you assume (again) that I don't check out other news sources. Your problem is that you confuse commentary with news, as well as comic entertainment with news. Remember, it is almost ALWAYS the liberal that insists on links when ever one of us makes a statement. Don't blame us if we do not wish to view your links to some off the wall liberal article by some radical that uses no facts but gets you all riled up thinking he is an expert.
I suggested that liberals had their heads in the sand because I did not think that any intelligent person could possibly, being informed still vote for a Clinton, especially Hillary. I had given you the benefit of doubt as to being intelligent, therefore I had "assumed" that you were intelligent but ignorant of facts related to her. I mean, there has been no denial, just defensive attacks on the part of the Clinton clan. She did lie pathologically, but lying is not as bad as her actions/history.