Quote:
Originally Posted by Villageswimmer
Doubtful. IMHO the post was not only full of unsubstantiated conjecture, it was crude and disrespectful. Excellent? Factual? Really?
|
Time to play devil's advocate and defend this, well, healthcare worker.
By the terminology and those parts of her post that fit the events, it is likely she is employed by TVH. We had a 7 physician practice with 48 employees, it was naïve to think that everyone, even the file clerks, did not have a pretty good idea of what was going on. That is the nature of a medical office. Even "rumors" weren't usually all that far off the mark. I think we were reading more than "conjecture"
I might have skipped the insulting wording, but is it any more crude or disrespectful than those that called TVH liars, or uncaring, or con artists???
If she is employed there, how could she possibly name sources? Not only would her job be at risk, but also anyone who told her anything.
In all likelihood, there is a lot of truth in her post, and I doubt the head of TVH would come out with the whole story.