Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I disagree if this is supposed to be a discussion forum then this is a worthy issue .
It has to do with veracity in both words and deeds and complete lack thereof .
Hoe can the Dems defend this ?
|
I am a registered Republican, but I don't have any problem defending what they are doing. Where does it say that the DNC wants to withhold their donors names forever. All the posts above imply that. If you don't respond two minutes after the start of the thread, the statements made in the thread are gospel.
They are asking the Philly judge to allow them to withhold the names until after the convention. There are three plus months until the election. What difference does one week make?
You know that our party is going to do everything they can to disrupt the DNC Convention. All the DNC is doing is defending themselves against an attack.
Who the hell cares, who the donors are to the DNC?
Here are the guild lines for donations to each party.
http://www.opensecrets.org/overview/limits.php
The big money isn't going directly into the parties.
The heavy donors aren't sending most of their money to the DNC/RNC party headquarters. They are sending them to Pacs. Most of these Pacs are charitable organizations, and they don't have to make their donors known.
Go ahead. Start with the comments, you are not a true Republican. That is right I wanted John Kasich as the nominee. He is someone that would have tried to fix Washington. Our party doesn't want to fix Washington. We just want to make it worse. Go Trump Go!